Joint committee runs non-partisan survey on Pulangi V

MALAYBALAY CITY (Bukidnon News/13 February) A mediation group, Mediator’s Network for Sustainable Peace (Mednet), Inc. has facilitated the formation of a joint fact finding committee composed of representatives from the proponent, the opponents, and the communities affected by the proposed 300-megawatt Pulangi hydro electric power project in southern Bukidnon and Cotabato province, Malaybalay bishop Jose Cabantan said.  
Cabantan told the 42nd Diocesan Pastoral Assembly, the biggest gathering of church leaders in the diocese’s 49 parishes around the province, that the proposed Pulangi V project is a concern for the diocese along with the peace and order situation in Upper Pulangi.
He said Mednet, a non-government organization focused on social development in peace and conflict resolution, can help gather the two parties together despite the differences in positions, and talk about it.
Cabantan said former Malaybalay bishop Honesto Pacana has already asked Mednet to come down and help in 2010.
He told Bukidnon News Friday he needed to explain about Mednet to the church workers because the information about the group’s role was not cascaded down to the communities especially in southern Bukidnon where the project was proposed to be built. He said data gathering has started in the communities of Dangcagan town already.
The 17-members joint committee has initiated the survey among the affected communities to check on the people’s understanding of the proposed project, as well as socio-economic profile of the settlers and indigenous people s that will be affected, according to Caroliza Tulod-Peteros, Mednet mediation service coordinator.
Tulod-Peteros told this reporter via telephone Monday the joint committee came as a result of their conflict mapping where they found among the highlights there were conflicts in both parties’ basic information on the effect of the project on the people and in their perspectives of development.
The joint fact finding committee, she added, decided to run the survey to address the conflict in basic information after the results of their conflict mapping was presented to a crowd of at least 500 from the different sectors.
“Hopefully this will lead to learning and understanding,” she said.
But she clarified that as a participatory process there is a difficult and long work ahead, especially with constraints in the budget.
She said Mednet does not receive any funds from the parties to facilitate.
The bishop recognized that the proposed project “went through some heated debates” and it’s about time to tap the mediation process.
But he clarified that indeed the pace of the project is slow because of some constraints including funding.
Cabantan said one of the issues for clarification for the fact-finding team is the number of villages and extent of inundation among those villages, which became a serious point of contention between proponents and opponents.
He said they have tapped the services of the Environmental Science for Social Change (ESSC) to map out the areas expected to be affected by the project.
The bishop said the 3rd party mediator has also initiated a survey among the households in the 20 Bukidnon barangays expected to be affected. He said the survey will probe the communities expected to be affected and check their stand on the project.
But the bishop clarified that the Diocese still has no official position yet on the Pulangi V pending the fact-finding and survey results conducted by Mednet.
Cabantan said this does not stop the parishes and personalities from expressing their own opinion, especially those in the areas to be affected.
The bishop said the survey and the fact-finding initiatives are meant at exploring other options.
He said the public is made to believe that the mega-dam is the only option.
“We have to explore other options that which will provide optimal use of our resources,” he added.
Fibeco and Greenergy Development Corporation, proponents of the project, were able to obtain in June 2011 an endorsement from the Northern Mindanao Regional Development Council (RDC) to the “Department of Energy and other concerned agencies for appropriate action”, according to documents the proponents submitted to the Bukidnon Sangguniang Panlalawigan.
But the RDC in the resolution approved on June 28, 2011 said they recognized the importance, supports the project, and endorses it for approval “subject to compliance by the proponent in addressing issues and concerns.”
The RDC said the proponents, Fibeco and Greenergy, should update the project feasibility study to incorporate the revised financial and economic analysis of the project; obtain the necessary clearances from the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP), the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Environmental Management Bureau (EMB), and the National Water Resources Board.
The council also said the proponents must secure endorsements from the local government units of the provinces of Bukidnon and North Cotabato, the Municipality of Kibawe, and the barangays of Sanipon and Pinamula in Kibawe town.
Along with the NWRB application, the proponents have attached endorsements from 20 barangay council, four municipalities, as well as the endorsements from the RDC and the National Economic Development Authority (NEDA).
The NWRB required that the provincial board post the application at its bulletin board. The provincial board, however, will post only the notice if the proponent submits documentary requirements.
Board member Alfeo Baguio, committee on environmental protection and natural resources chair, said their request is not yet acted in his committee pending the submission of at least eight documents including a notarized disclosure of no pending case for violation of environmental laws by the company’s authorized official or by the proprietor and a resolution from LGUs concerned of the conduct of public consultations. The application was filed the National Irrigation Administration, the local NWRB agent.
Vera Files, reported, however last year that leaders of indigenous communities in Bukidnon have refused to engage in any discussion over the planned project, until dam proponents submit a cultural impact assessment that will detail the damage the dam will cause the tribes. (Walter I. Balane/Bukidnon News)
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: